air carbon capture – Thinking Port

CleanTechnica Report: A case study into a technology that should be set aside until 2050, Carbon Engineering’s air-to-fuel fig leaf

October 28, 2019 admin air carbon capture, biofuels, carbon engineering, clean power, clean transport, cleantechnica, cleantechnica exclusive, cleantechnica reports, climate change, Coal, david keith, direct air capture, electric cars, Electric vehicles, Fossil Fuels, green economy, green jobs, investment, Manufacturing, natural gas, Oil, policy & politics, research, SCIENCE, wind energy

Credit to Author: Michael Barnard| Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 03:00:59 +0000

Researching air-carbon capture for use post-2050 remains a very good means of establishing the intellectual capital and basic technologies for when it makes sense to use them. But attempts to commercialize them today are premature

CleanTech Energy News Science

CleanTechnica Exclusive: A case study into a technology that should be set aside until 2050, Carbon Engineering’s air-to-fuel fig leaf

Credit to Author: Michael Barnard| Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 03:00:59 +0000

CleanTech Energy News

Yang Would Spend $3 Trillion On Residential Solar, But The Same Money Could Decarbonize The Grid Entirely

September 6, 2019 admin 2020 election, 2020 us election, Agriculture, air carbon capture, air quality, andrew yang, Carbon Capture, carbon capture and storage, carbon pricing, carbon sequestration, carbon tax, clean power, clean transport, cleantechnica, cleantechnica exclusive, climate change, consumer technology, democratic candidates, democratic primaries, Democrats, electric cars, Electric vehicles, energy efficiency, geoengineering, green economy, green jobs, grid, high speed rail, hydroelectric, investment, mark z. jacobson, nuclear energy, policy & politics, rooftop solar, Smart Grid, Solar energy, solar power plants, subsidies, United States, us energy policy, US Politics, wind energy, yang2020

Credit to Author: Michael Barnard| Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2019 03:50:26 +0000

Yang’s single largest dollar expenditure, 62% of his US$4.9 trillion budget, would only impact 2% to 5% of US energy consumption. And his investments on geoengineering, fusion, and thorium nuclear generation are purely wasted expenditures